News

GCRTA Warns of Major Service Cuts Without New Revenue Source

Agency leaders outlined three financial scenarios, including one that could require cutting service on two-thirds of bus routes by 2029 if no new revenue is secured.

by Ken Prendergast, NEOTrans | Jun. 24, 2026 | 10:00 AM

Photographed by NEOtrans

Photographed by NEOtrans

This article was published through an exclusive content-sharing agreement with neo-trans.blog.

The Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority’s (GCRTA) Board of Trustees learned on June 23 the bus and rail agency is facing one of three potential futures. While there are solutions to all three, GCRTA staff said only two would offer some benefits in addressing costs that are spiraling out of control.

The one option that didn’t involve a large, new source of revenue such as a sales-tax hike would likely require reducing or eliminating bus services on two-thirds of routes in Cuyahoga County each year until January 2029. Additional service cuts would likely follow until new revenue sources are found.

The other two options assumed increasing a 1-percent countywide transit levy that hasn’t risen since voters approved it on July 22, 1975. Those options allowed increasing service a little or a lot, and delaying any thoughts of service cuts a little or a lot, GCRTA staff said in a detailed presentation.

Raising the countywide sales tax by 0.25 percent would allow minor transit service increases in the coming years until inflation might again force service cuts by 2039. Or a 0.5-percent sales tax hike would afford more frequent services and hold off any consideration of service cuts until at least 2064.

But few of the service expansions considered by GCRTA involve new bus or rail routes, except for running the Blue/Green light-rail lines from Shaker Heights west of Tower City to the Airport and restoring the Nos. 263 North Olmsted and 246 Westlake Park-N-Ride express bus routes to Downtown.

CLE Daily Newsletter

What you need to know to start a great day in Cleveland. Get the latest updates news, food and culture in your email inbox six days a week.

Instead, most service increases would involve more frequent service on existing lines. That’s better than the alternative — major service cuts, GCRTA staff told board members at June 23's meeting.

However, cost-saving options like reducing salaries, wages, benefits and staffing, or increasing automation, contracting out bus and rail transit operations, or real estate opportunities were not proposed.

After the budget cuts that were approved for this year, with minimal service cuts, GCRTA anticipates it will have to make another $30 million reduction in expenses by the end of 2029 absent additional revenue. That includes a $17 million service reduction over three years and another $13 million in other organizational cost savings.

The service reductions could include the discontinuation of 10 of GCRTA’s 41 remaining bus routes. It used to have more than 60 routes in the first decade of the 2000s before several rounds of service cuts were made to cope with growing inflation and declining sales tax revenues.

After cutting 10 routes by the start of 2029, GCRTA officials said the remaining routes would see less frequent service which means longer wait times for a bus or train and a less useful network with worse connections every day.

Service Reductions RTA
Courtesy of GCRTA

Paratransit service, whose coverage area is based on the regular route network under the federal Americans with Disabilities Act, would also see a coverage reduction due to the discontinued regular bus routes.

Such service cuts could reduce transit access to 524,000 jobs and the homes of 800,000 people. Of that about 68,500 jobs and 175,000 people will lose access to transit services offering a departure every 15 minutes or better on weekdays, said GCRTA Service Management Director Joel Freilich.

GCRTA General Manager & CEO India Birdsong Terry said the service cuts are a non-starter. In fact, she considered June 23's meeting part of “a journey to the ballot box.”

“What are the options?” she asked the board. “What do we find possible with projections of funding that could come in from ballot box initiatives at whatever percentage the board decides to instruct us to go after. We are a little beyond research (mode now).”

GCRTA
Courtesy of GCRTA

In addition to less frequent service every day, weekday services could be discontinued on the bus route Nos. 2, 8, 16, 34, 35, 39, 55B/C branches and 251. Light-rail service on the Green Line (Shaker Boulevard) could be discontinued after 8 pm on weekdays.

All service reductions would require public hearings under federal law before any cuts can be made. Less frequent service means making fewer connections to other routes, Freiluch explained.

“If you can’t make connections, the automobile analogy is, you can drive but you’re not allowed to turn the steering wheel,” he said. “So that does limit your destinations. A transit network depends on your ability to make connections. You can’t just limit all your activities to the street you’re on.”

At a June 16 GCRTA board meeting, the agency’s staff said GCRTA’s operating budget would need a transfer from its Revenue Stabilization Fund of $33.5 million to make ends meet in 2027 — even after the budget cuts approved earlier this year.

Since it is GCRTA policy to maintain a reserve fund equal to 30 days of operating expenses to cover any emergencies, this expected 2027 transfer represents a budgetary gap that needs to be immediately addressed, said GCRTA Public Information Officer Robert Fleig.

“As a result, the first $33.5 million of the potential proceeds from the new revenue of $70 Million — under the 0.25 percent scenario — and the $140 million — under the 0.50 percent scenario — will be to mitigate the structural gap,” Fleig told NEOtrans.

Under the 0.25-percent sales tax hike, that would leave $15 million per year for new services and $21.5 million per year for increasing the operating reserve from 30 days to 90 days. Under the 0.50-percent hike, that would avail $25 million per year for new services and $81.5 million to lengthen the operating reserve to 180 days.

And either option would provide a local funding share to leverage state and federal grants for keeping GCRTA’s bus and rail fleet, plus their infrastructure and facilities in a state of good repair, said Rajan Gautam, deputy general manager of finance and secretary-treasurer of the board.

For more updates about Cleveland, sign up for our Cleveland Magazine Daily newsletter, delivered to your inbox six times a week.

Cleveland Magazine is also available in print, featuring immersive stories, helpful guides and beautiful photography and design.

Ken Prendergast, NEOTrans

Ken Prendergast is a local professional journalist who loves and cares about Cleveland, its history and its development. He has worked as a journalist for more than three decades for publications such as NEOtrans, Sun Newspapers, Ohio Passenger Rail News, Passenger Transport, and others. He also provided consulting services to transportation agencies, real estate firms, port authorities and nonprofit organizations. He runs NEOtrans Blog covers the Greater Cleveland region’s economic, development, real estate, construction and transportation news since 2011. His content is published on Cleveland Magazine as part of an exclusive sharing agreement.

Get the Latest in Your Inbox

Whether you're looking for daily news bites, the latest bites or bite-sized adventures, the Cleveland Magazine Daily newsletter experiences have something for everyone.